Norway Makes Strong Case For Disarming Police Makes sense… of course, there is another side effect to having a force of unarmed police officers. that is, they’re are defenseless in the face of evil. case in point, norway mass murderer anders behring breivik who killed 77 people, including an unarmed police officer, in shooting and bombing attacks in 2011. Norway faced a similar choice between arming and disarming police officers after far right gunman anders behring breivik killed 77 people in 2011.
Norway Makes Strong Case For Disarming Police Read all about the police system in norway, from how to become a police officer to how prosecutions work. norway is known more for its crime novels than for its actual criminal scene. that being. Norway is one of 19 countries worldwide where police officers are typically unarmed, and permitted to use guns only in exceptional circumstances. The disarming order comes just a day after italian police led a coordinated crackdown all over europe and in norway on an alleged terrorist network led by the former refugee and islamic cleric mullah krekar, who’s been living in norway since receiving asylum in 1991. In a nation where approximately one third of the population owns guns, it might sound strange to argue that police officers should not “police” the community while being armed. after all, the second amendment does protect the rights of citizens to keep or “own” and bear or “carry” firearms. the supreme court, which is charged with interpreting the constitution, has consistently.
The Case For Disarming The Police The disarming order comes just a day after italian police led a coordinated crackdown all over europe and in norway on an alleged terrorist network led by the former refugee and islamic cleric mullah krekar, who’s been living in norway since receiving asylum in 1991. In a nation where approximately one third of the population owns guns, it might sound strange to argue that police officers should not “police” the community while being armed. after all, the second amendment does protect the rights of citizens to keep or “own” and bear or “carry” firearms. the supreme court, which is charged with interpreting the constitution, has consistently. The primary objection to police disarmament is likely to be that officers need their guns for safety and that any proposal to disarm them fails to take officer safety seriously. Police no longer come from the communities they serve in most cases. cops are often out of uniform and in unmarked vehicles while performing their duties. peel said this was a recipe for disaster.
Norwegian Armed Police Stock Image Colourbox The primary objection to police disarmament is likely to be that officers need their guns for safety and that any proposal to disarm them fails to take officer safety seriously. Police no longer come from the communities they serve in most cases. cops are often out of uniform and in unmarked vehicles while performing their duties. peel said this was a recipe for disaster.
Norwegian Armed Police Stock Image Colourbox
Norwegian Armed Police Stock Image Colourbox