United States V Susan B Anthony Arrested For Voting Speaking For A
United States V Susan B Anthony Arrested For Voting Speaking For A A summary of the importance of the 1873 court case, united states v. susan b. anthony, in which suffrage leader anthony and others illegally voted. On november 5, 1872, in the fi rst district of the eighth ward of rochester, new york, susan b. anthony and fourteen other women voted in the united states election, which included the election for members of congress.
United States V Susan B Anthony Arrested For Voting
United States V Susan B Anthony Arrested For Voting Susan b. anthony united states v. susan b. anthony was the criminal trial of susan b. anthony in a u.s. federal court in 1873. the defendant was a leader of the women's suffrage movement who was arrested for voting in rochester, new york in the 1872 elections in violation of state laws that allowed only men to vote. anthony argued that she had the right to vote because of the recently adopted. Summary susan b. anthony was both a leading abolitionist and a founder of the mid nineteenth century women’s movement. during reconstruction, anthony and her allies in congress pressed the framers of the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments to confer the right to vote on women as well as black men. At the election of president and vice president of the united states, and members of congress, in november, 1872, susan b. anthony, and several other women, offered their votes to the inspectors. The defendant, miss susan b. anthony, at that time resided in the city of rochester, in the county of monroe, northern district of new york, and upon the 5th day of november, 1872, she voted for a representative in the congress of the united states, to represent the 29th congressional district of this state, and also for a representative at.
Overview Of United States V Susan B Anthony
Overview Of United States V Susan B Anthony At the election of president and vice president of the united states, and members of congress, in november, 1872, susan b. anthony, and several other women, offered their votes to the inspectors. The defendant, miss susan b. anthony, at that time resided in the city of rochester, in the county of monroe, northern district of new york, and upon the 5th day of november, 1872, she voted for a representative in the congress of the united states, to represent the 29th congressional district of this state, and also for a representative at. The defendant [susan b. anthony], a female, was indicted for a violation of the 19th section of the act of may 31st, 1870 (16 stat. 144), which provides, “that if, at any election for representative * * in the congress of the united states, any person shall knowingly * * vote without having a lawful right to vote, * * every such person shall be deemed guilty of a crime, and shall, for such. In its decision on minor v. happersett, the supreme court's unanimous opinion was that the right of suffrage was not one of the privileges and immunities of citizenship, and women — although citizens of the united states — could be denied the vote by their respective states.
Overview Of United States V Susan B Anthony The defendant [susan b. anthony], a female, was indicted for a violation of the 19th section of the act of may 31st, 1870 (16 stat. 144), which provides, “that if, at any election for representative * * in the congress of the united states, any person shall knowingly * * vote without having a lawful right to vote, * * every such person shall be deemed guilty of a crime, and shall, for such. In its decision on minor v. happersett, the supreme court's unanimous opinion was that the right of suffrage was not one of the privileges and immunities of citizenship, and women — although citizens of the united states — could be denied the vote by their respective states.
United States Versus Susan B Anthony By Teach Simple
United States Versus Susan B Anthony By Teach Simple